‘Bitelchús Bitelchús’: trailer, fecha de estreno, reparto, sinopsis y todo lo que sabemos de ‘Bitelchús 2’

La película llegaráeste año con sus protagonistas originales y Jenna Ortega a las órdenes de Tim Burton.

POR MIREIA MULLOR

Ir a:

Bitelchús, Bitelchús, Bitelchús… y aparece otra vez: el legendario personaje que conocimos en la película de Tim Burton en los años 80 volverá en una secuela, ‘Bitelchús 2’, que se llamará ‘Beetlejuice Beetlejuice’ en su título originaly que contará de nuevo con Winona Ryder y Michael Keaton, además del fichaje de Jenna Ortega (la estrella de ‘Miércoles’ de Netflix). Esta continuación producida por Warner Bros. ya tiene fecha de estreno, reparto principal y más detalles que recopilamos aquí mientras contamos los días para poder ver en la gran pantalla una de las películas más esperadas de 2024.

Estrenada en 1988, ‘Bitelchús’ es para muchos una de las mejores películas de Tim Burton, todo un éxito que partió de un guion de Michael McDowell y Larry Wilson y nos ofreció algunos momentos y outfits realmente icónicos. ¿Cómo olvidar el momento de la cena al son de ‘Banana Boat’ de Harry Belafonte? ¿O la estética gótica de Ryder y el traje a rayas de Keaton? Sin duda, la secuela tiene el listón muy alto, pero, mientras prepara la temporada 2 de ‘Miércoles’ en Netflix, Tim Burton está preparado para sorprendernos.

‘Bitelchús Bitelchús’: fecha de estreno

Apunta: la fecha de estreno de ‘Bitelchús 2’ será el 6 de septiembre de 2024. Está previsto que la producción comience en junio.

bitelchus 2WARNER BROS.

‘Bitelchús Bitelchús’: reparto

Como apuntábamos, la secuela de ‘Bitelchús’ contará en su reparto con algunos de los actores originales de la película de 1988, que formarán equipo con una nueva generación que llega para tomar el relevo.

Se ha confirmado que Winona Ryder volverá a interpretar a Lydia más de treinta años después de los eventos de la película original. Ahora bien, la protagonista de la secuela será Jenna Ortega, que interpreta a la hija de Lydia. Ortega ha sido catapultada a la fama por la serie ‘Miércoles’ de Netflix, y la actriz continúa con el estilo gótico en su reunión con Tim Burton para el filme.

bitelchus 2WARNER BROS.

También se ha confirmado que volverá Michael Keaton, quien dio vida al mismísimo Bitelchús. De momento se desconoce si el resto del reparto principal de la película de 1988 volverá para algún tipo de cameo, entre los que se encuentran Alec Baldwin, Geena Davis, Jeffrey Jones y Catherine O’Hara.

Como nuevos fichajes, el actor Justin Theroux se ha unido al reparto, al igual que Mónica Bellucci, según adelantó en exclusiva ‘The Hollywood Reporter’, que podría interpretar a la esposa del principal protagonista. Además, otros nombres tan potentes como Willem Dafoe (que recientemente ha estrenado ‘Pobres criaturas’) o Justin Theroux (protagonista de ‘Los que se quedan’) han sido confirmados.

‘Bitelchús Bitelchús’: sinopsis

Por el momento, Warner Bros. no ha proporcionado una sinopsis oficial de ‘Bitelchús 2’, por lo que no sabemos qué aventuras le esperan al personaje interpretado por Jenna Ortega en esta secuela. Eso sí, Catherine O’Hara ya ha adelantado que podremos escuchar de nuevo el tema ‘Banana Boat’, que ponía ritmo a una de las escenas más icónicas de la cinta original.

Ahora bien, podemos especular que la historia incluirá una adolescente rebelde, una entrada al mundo de los muertos y la aparición de un delirante y peligroso ser que aparece cuando dices su nombre tres veces seguidas. No nos cabe duda de que Burton querrá ser fiel a la historia original que él mismo puso en imágenes, y que tirará de nostalgia tanto como pueda.

‘Bitelchús Bitelchús’: póster

Además de las primeras imágenes de ‘Bitelchús Bitelchús’, el teaser póster nos dio un dato revelador: el título de la secuela.

textWARNER BROS.

‘Bitelchús Bitelchús’: tráiler

Ya puedes disfrutar aquí del primer teaser tráiler de ‘Bitelchús Bitelchús’.

Bitelchús Bitelchús | Teaser Tráiler Oficial

por Fotogramas ESReproducción Vídeo

ACTIVAR SONIDO

preview for Bitelchús Bitelchús | Teaser Tráiler Oficial

Headshot of Mireia Mullor

MIREIA MULLOR

Mireia es experta en cine y series en la revista FOTOGRAMAS, donde escribe sobre todo tipo de estrenos de películas y series de Netflix, HBO Max y más. Su ídolo es Agnès Varda y le apasiona el cine de autor, pero también está al día de todas las noticias de Marvel, Disney, Star Wars y otras franquicias, y tiene debilidad por el anime japonés; un perfil polifacético que también ha demostrado en cabeceras como ESQUIRE y ELLE. 

En sus siete años en FOTOGRAMAS ha conseguido hacerse un hueco como redactora y especialista SEO en la web, y también colabora y forma parte del cuadro crítico de la edición impresa. Ha tenido la oportunidad de entrevistar a estrellas de la talla de Ryan Gosling, Jake Gyllenhaal, Zendaya y Kristen Stewart (aunque la que más ilusión le hizo sigue siendo Jane Campion), cubrir grandes eventos como los Oscars y asistir a festivales como los de San Sebastián, Londres, Sevilla y Venecia (en el que ha ejercido de jurado FIPRESCI). Además, ha participado en campañas de contenidos patrocinados con el equipo de Hearst Magazines España, y tiene cierta experiencia en departamentos de comunicación y como programadora a través del Kingston International Film Festival de Londres. 

Mireia es graduada en Periodismo por la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB) y empezó su carrera como periodista cinematográfica en medios online como la revista Insertos y Cine Divergente, entre otros. En 2023 se publica su primer libro, ‘Biblioteca Studio Ghibli: Nicky, la aprendiz de bruja’ (Editorial Héroes de Papel), un ensayo en profundidad sobre la película de Hayao Miyazaki de 1989.   .

Ver bio completa

x
youtube
facebook
instagram

HEARST ESPAÑACONTACTOPUBLICIDADSUSCRÍBETENEWSLETTEREDICIÓN DIGITALCINE ESPAÑOLSERIES NETFLIXSERIES MOVISTAR+SERIES HBONOVEDADES DE AMAZON PRIME VÍDEO

Hearst Editorial - Fotogramas, marca perteneciente al grupo Hearst Magazines International

Fotogramas, marca perteneciente al grupo Hearst Magazines International

Fotogramas participa en varios programas de afiliación de marketing, lo que significa que Fotogramas recibe comisiones de las compras hechas a través de los links a sitios de los vendedores.

©2024 Hearst España S.L. Todos los derechos sobre las marcas, imágenes y contenidos están protegidos.

AVISO DE PRIVACIDADPOLÍTICA DE COOKIESAVISO LEGALSITEMAPINICIAR SESIÓN EN CONTENT PASS

Elección De Cookies

“The History of Racist Ideas”: Roger Ross Williams on Stamped From the Beginning

by Lauren Wissot
in DirectorsInterviews
on Nov 10, 2023

DocumentaryNetflixRoger Ross WilliamsStamped From the Beginning

Though I’ve not read Dr. Ibram X. Kendi’s New York Times bestseller Stamped From the Beginning: the Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America, I’m guessing the National Book Award-winner might not be the most obvious material for the big screen. Which is why I was a bit surprised when I finally watched the TIFF-debuting Netflix doc Stamped From the Beginning, Roger Ross Williams’ cinematic and often playful take on the professor-author’s quite heavy subject matter. Indeed, any film that opens with its (Black) director ambushing his (Black) talking heads with the query/salvo, “What is wrong with Black people?” is announcing a rather anti-staid-academic vibe.

To learn all about weaving archival footage with intellectual interviews (mostly with Black, female Ph.D. heavyweights, including Imani Perry and Angela Davis), and reenactments with evocative animation—all set to a lively hip-hop score, Filmmaker caught up with the unbelievably busy, Oscar-winning director-producer-writer (whose Cassandro and Love to Love You, Donna Summer—not to mention The 1619 Project television series—also released this past year). Stamped From the Beginning hits Netflix on November 10th.

Filmmaker: How exactly did the doc originate? What made you think this particular book material could be made into a cinematic film?

Williams: When [the murder of] George Floyd happened in America and there was a racial reckoning, the number one book on the New York Times bestseller list was [Kendi’s] How to Be an Antiracist. I was personally blown away by the protests all across America and in every small community. Even in the small, upstate New York, all-white farming town where I live, they were protesting, holding Black Lives Matter signs. I was moved to tears and knew I had to explore that.

Further down on the NYT bestseller list was Stamped From the Beginning. That book broke down the history of racist ideas in a way I have never seen or experienced before—even internalized racism that I had against Black people myself as a Black American.

I didn’t have the resources to option the book myself, so I called my good friends at Netflix and said, “Let’s do this together.” I wanted to do it as a tight, 90-minute film, because I wanted people to go into the theater, or sit down and watch it at home, and be transformed. I wanted it to be accessible, to show how it relates to our lives today. And I wanted it to feel pop cultural, because pop culture is how America disseminates racist ideas. Racism is embedded in our psyche. It destroys our culture and hurts everyone. I wanted to use every tool in my toolkit to tell a really powerful story.

Filmmaker: Between the interviews, archival footage, animation and actors—not to mention the jam-packed soundtrack—this film feels like a daunting production, with so many moving parts. How did you develop and combine all these components? Simultaneously? One element at a time?

Williams: The first thing I said to myself was, “This can’t look or feel like any other historical documentary we’ve ever seen. It has to feel completely fresh, completely new.” So, all those tools—VFX, animation, needle drop of popular music, playing with time—are great tools for documentarians, and a way that people can relate to the material and understand it in today’s language.

It became about connecting the past to the present, where we let go of this strict academic approach to the material and just have fun. That’s where the VFX, the animation, all of that comes into play. And then I came up with this concept of “9 Lies About Black People.” The “9 Lies” really helped structure everything and became the framework for the film.

Filmmaker: I was quite excited to learn that you worked with AWESOME + modest (whose animation I’m familiar with through Zackary Drucker’s films) as well as Black Women Animate on this project. What was the process of collaborating with these artists like?

Williams: The script by [writer-producer] David Teague had VFX scenes outlined, so there was a blueprint. We knew which scenes we wanted to do early on, and we also had the thought that we wanted to do those scenes shot with actors on a green screen and rotoscoped in the art style of the time. I’d seen AWESOME + modest’s work via The Stroll and thought they’d be great for this film as well.

We’d also heard about the incredible work of Black Women Animate and wanted to work with them, even more so after we thought of the nine chapter headings as the framework of the film. They’d submitted a wonderful proposal for fonts and chapter headings using archival and animations. Once we saw those, it was a no-brainer. It was really important to us, overall, to tap into cutting edge Black talent to tell this very important story that affects every Black American.

Filmmaker: I was a bit startled to see an intimacy coordinator listed in the credits. What led you to hire one? Was this solely for specific scenes?

Williams: Well, this work includes very sensitive matter. We created a scene with a male actor who was evoking an enslaver being predatory towards the enslaved. It was really important to myself and my incredible producer, Alisa Payne, to have an intimacy coordinator on set for both actors in that scene—to make sure they felt comfortable with the grabbing, what they were saying to each other and putting them in that type of position.

Filmmaker: Ultimately, how was this process of bringing book to screen different from your prior projects?

Williams: When I read Stamped from the Beginning I was transformed. I saw myself differently and was further awakened to the way racist ideas embed themselves in American policy and pop culture. I had to make this movie. So, I went to Netflix, who optioned the book along with me and helped me achieve that goal.

‘Depp vs. Heard’: Netflix estrena la polémica docuserie sobre el juicio entre Johnny Depp y Amber Heard

La docuserie analiza lo ocurrido durante el juicio entre las estrellas que se celebró en 2022.

POR JORGE FERNÁNDEZ MENCÍAS

En los últimos meses, Netflix está apostando muy fuerte por las docuseries de casos que han sido de gran interés para el público. Ahí tenemos el estreno de ‘Baraja’, el asesino en serie más famoso de España o la muy reciente ‘Las últimas horas de Mario Biondo’, la polémica miniserie sobre el fallecimiento del cámara de televisión y exmarido de la presentadora Raquel Sánchez Silva y que, visto el resultado, se aleja de la lista de los mejores documentales de Netflix que hay que ver.

Este año, además, hemos asistido a la contienda legal entre Gwyneth Paltrow y Terry Sanderson y ahora, casi un año después del fallo en el caso de Johnny Depp contra Amber Heard, Netflix apuesta por uno de los casos que han tenido una mayor repercusión en los últimos tiempos, considerado el juicio del siglo al incluir esa irrenunciable connotación morbosa al tratarse de una de las exparejas más conocidas de la industria cinematográfica.

amber heard johnny depp juicioGETTY IMAGES

GETTY IMAGES

Recordemos que, en 2022, Johnny Depp alegó tres cargos de difamación por 50 millones de dólares en daños y perjuicios sobre la acusada -y su expareja- Amber Heard. Una Amber Heard que realizó una serie de acusaciones contra Johnny Depp y que, tras ser acusado de maltrato, el actor de ‘Donnie Brasco’ pudo comprobar otro gran juicio a su alrededor, el de las grandes productoras de Hollywood, que decidieron dictar sentencia y dejarle de lado, como demuestra su exclusión en producciones como ‘Animales fantásticos: Los secretos de Dumbledore’.

El documental ‘Depp vs. Heard’ se estrena en Netflix el próximo miércoles 16 de agosto (también en España, suponemos que para disgusto de Amber Heard, que ahora reside en Madrid). Y ha llegado para demostrar que los juicios a las estrellas de Hollywood son la nueva moda del entretenimiento y, a través de tres capítulosanalizará al detalle todo lo que sucedió tras las denuncias de difamación y maltrato que se interpusieron entre ellos.

amber heard johnny deppNETFLIX

La serie se anticipa de este modo a la futura película sobre el juicio entre Johnny Depp y Amber Heard y hará un repaso de los hechos que acontecieron durante el juicio, cuestionando qué es y qué coste tiene la verdad en la sociedad actual.

Asimismo, ‘Depp vs. Heard’ apostará por mostrar todo el circo mediático que se montó en redes sociales como TikTok gracias a la posibilidad de poder seguir el juicio celebrado en el condado de Fairfax, Virginia a través de YouTube, lo que ocasionó que millones de personas pudieran ser testigos de un litigio que duró más de 200 horas, comentando el mismo y compartiendo toda clase de debates ejerciendo casi de jueces de la moralidad.

Headshot of Jorge Fernández Mencías

JORGE FERNÁNDEZ MENCÍAS

Jorge es experto en cine, series y cómics. Sus géneros favoritos son el terror y la ciencia ficción, el perfecto equilibrio entre el atronador grito del slasher y el inquietante silencio del espacio y, aunque coquetea con el cine de autor en busca de esa joya oculta alejada del mainstream, él no se esconde, lo suyo es el cine comercial de la mano de Marvel, Star Wars, DC y Pixar. 

Este inquieto periodista descubrió hace unos años el misticismo de ‘Twin Peaks’ y, desde entonces, es tan solo un concepto más atrapado dentro de la cabeza de David Lynch. Cuando consigue escapar de la Logia Negra, revisita la filmografía del maestro Carpenter, se pierde de nuevo entre las páginas del ‘Watchmen’ de Moore y Gibbons o se lanza en busca de nuevas emociones en formato miniserie. 

Tras su fugaz paso por medios como TVE, RNE y la sección de TV y comunicación de La Razón, Jorge lleva más de una década en el delirante mundo de las agencias de publicidad, donde ha tenido la oportunidad de formar parte de diversos equipos de comunicación que le han permitido participar en saraos, eventos, junkets y gestiones varias con intérpretes de la talla de Antonio de la Torre, Jared Harris, Kim Dickens, Colman Domingo y Christina Hendricks. Llegó a FOTOGRAMAS en 2022, donde consiguió hacerse un hueco como redactor para escribir sobre las series más populares, las mejores películas de Alfred Hitchcock o todo lo relacionado con las franquicias, reboots, precuelas, secuelas, recuelas y disparates varios del momento, retomando de esta forma su pasión por el periodismo y el cine. 

Jorge es licenciado en periodismo por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, además de ser realizador por el Instituto RTVE, donde adquirió nociones de preproducción, producción y posproducción de audiovisuales.  

Ver bio completa

The Best Movies New to Every Major Streaming Platform in July 2023

From Netflix to Prime, and Hulu to the Criterion Channel, here are the best movies coming to each streaming platform this month.

BY DAVID EHRLICH

Netflix may get most of the attention, but it’s hardly a one-stop shop for cinephiles looking to stream essential classic and contemporary films. Each of the prominent streaming platforms caters to its own niche of film obsessives.

From the boundless wonders of the Criterion Channel to the new frontiers of streaming offered by the likes of Max and Disney Plus (at least during the rare months when the latter’s slate of new releases is large enough to warrant a mention), IndieWire’s monthly guide highlights the best of what’s coming to every major streamer, with an eye toward exclusive titles that may help readers decide which of these services is right for them.

Here is your guide for July 2023.

Stephen Curry in Stephen Curry: Underrated

Photo : Apple TV+

“Underrated” (dir. Peter Nicks, 2023)

Apple TV’s original programming remains scant when compared to some of its competitors (not necessarily a bad thing), but that helps call attention to each new movie they premiere on the service. The jury’s still out on “The Beanie Bubble,” which continues the recent trend of business biopics with what appears to be a very Zach Galifianakis-like take on the Beanie Babies phenomenon — it drops towards the end of the month. On the other hand, there’s no such uncertainty surrounding Peter Nicks’ Sundance-minuted “Stephen Curry: Underrated,” which focuses on its namesake’s formative years at Davidson College, and finds one of the country’s most probing documentary filmmakers trying to explain one of the country’s most dominant athletes. 

Available to stream July 21.

Tori and Lokita

Photo : The Criterion Channel

“Tori and Lokita” (dirs. Jean-Pierre & Luc Dardenne, 2022)

A sweltering embarrassment of riches even by the streamer’s already ridiculous standard, the Criterion Channel’s July lineup would be more than enough to keep you busy for an entire summer. It starts with their big themed series of the month, which offers a fun take on a depressingly relevant theme: AI. Surveying the various roles that artificial intelligence has played in cinema over the last 50 years or so, the wide-ranging program spans from the lo-fi comedy of “Dark Star” and the high-silliness of “Zardoz” and “Johnny Mnemonic” to the existential crises of “Ghost in the Shell” and Steven Spielberg’s heart-shattering “A.I. Artificial Intelligence.” These movies could hardly be more different, and yet all of them serve as compelling reminders that entrusting the future to AI is a more complicated proposition than some corporate overlords might imagine, and paying human writers is probably a more rewarding bet all around.

But that’s just the tip of the iceberg, as the Channel is also serving up a pre-“Priscilla” retro of Elvis classics (all the obvious titles, with “Flaming Star” dropping on September 1), a collection of mid-century British noir that’s perfect for cooling off (“Green for Danger,” “Time Without Pity,” etc.), and — for those who don’t mind the heat — a Roberto Rossellini retrospective that covers everything from “Rome Open City” and “The Flowers of St. Francis” to less-discussed later work like “The Age of Medici” and 1974’s “Cartesius.” 

And yet, despite all that (in addition to Susan Seidelman and George Méliès retros, too!), the real highlights of this slate might be the one-offs, which offer subscribers a chance to catch up with some of the year’s best films. Hlynur Pálmason’s epic “Godland” may lose some of its luster on the small screen, but this rugged tale of a 19th century Danish priest journeying to a remote corner of Iceland should prove transporting all the same. Ditto João Pedro Rodrigues’ scorching musical-comedy “Will-o’-the-Wisp,” and the Dardennes brothers’ singularly devastating “Tori and Lokita,” which is the Belgian duo’s angriest film and a movie capable of rattling you to the bone no matter how you watch it.

Available to stream July 18.

Other highlights:

– “A.I. Artificial Intelligence” (7/1)
– “Madeline’s Madeline” (7/1)
– “Stromboli” (7/1)

Diamond Island

Photo : Film Movement

“Diamond Island” (dir. Davy Chou, 2016)

Davy Chou’s astonishing “Return to Seoul” is one of those movies that instantly makes you want to watch everything its director has ever made  or will ever make, which is a bit frustrating when it comes to a young filmmaker whose body of work is both slim and hard to see. Chou has only made one other scripted feature, and until now there was nowhere that his newly minted American fans could find it without resorting to piracy. Enter: Film Movement Plus, who have stepped up to the plate and brought “Diamond Island” to the States, and given domestic audiences a long-overdue second chance to catch up with this dreamy coming-of-age sketch about an 18-year-old boy who leaves his rural village in order to find construction work on a glitzy pleasure island off the coast of Phnom Penh. It’s less assured and complete than “Return to Seoul,” perhaps, but it shares that film’s keen sense of alienation in a world aglow.

Available to stream July 7.

Other highlights:

– “Drowning by Numbers” (7/14)
– “Darkness” (7/28)

Thandiwe Newton in God's Country

Photo : Hulu

“God’s Country” (dir. Julian Higgins, 2022)

“God’s Country” flew a bit under the radar when it was released last fall after a low-key Sundance debut in January 2022, but this intense Thandiwe Newton vehicle is the kind of movie that’s ripe for rediscovery on streaming. Here’s some of what IndieWire’s Christian Zilko had to say about it when it first premiered:

The premise of “God’s Country” paints the proverbial “two Americas” with the broadest possible brushstrokes, pitting a Black, female humanities professor (Newton) against two white hunters who trespass on her property. Nobody mentions who they voted for, but the preconceived notions write themselves. Yet Julian Higgins’ excellent film digs deeper with each passing scene, subverting our first impressions of each character before letting them prove they are exactly who we thought they were; it constantly dangles redemption in front of our faces, begging us to imagine a better world at the same time as it delivers a stark reminder of how bitterly divided the country is. 

Available to stream July 28.

Other highlights:

– “The Quiet Girl” (7/7)
– “The Two Faces of January” (7/15)
– “In Viaggio” (7/27)

Fast Color

Photo : Max

“Fast Color” (dir. Julia Hart, 2018)

There’s a great low-budget sci-fi movie premiering on Max this month about two generations of Black women who are bonded together by the strength of the telekinetic powers that see them hunted by a mysterious white man in a slim-fit suit, but it’s definitely not the one that Max has pasted onto the top of its homepage alongside the latest season of “Project Greenlight” (which documents its doomed production). That’s not to throw the inexorably derivative “Gray Matter” under the bus — “Project Greenlight” never gives first-time directors like Meko Winbush a legitimate chance to succeed in the short-term — so much as it is to highlight the richness of Julia Hart’s “Fast Color,” a similar but far more nuanced film whose relative depth and poignancy illustrates the irreplaceable value of the development process. Its well-honed story beats sparked to life with the help of electrifying performances from Gugu Mbatha-Raw and Lorraine Toussaint, this curiously timed new addition to Max is the movie that “Gray Matter” might have been if its creation had been allowed to slow down a bit.

Available to stream July 1.

Other highlights:

– “Election” (7/1)
– “Klute” (7/1)
– “Shoplifters” (7/1)

Ziyi Zhang in 2046

Photo : MUBI

“2046” (dir. Wong Kar-wai, 2004)

MUBI is busting out the big guns this July, with a release slate that includes multiple hard-to-find films by Robert Altman (“California Split” and “Kansas City”!), Jacques Rivette (“La Belle Noiseuse” and “Gang of Four”!), a newly restored version of Lars von Trier’s brilliant (but hard-to-watch) “The Idiots,” a 2004 short film by the great Mia Hansen-Løve (“Un Pur Espirit”), and three different movies by Wong Kar-wai. Picking the “best” from a crop like that feels a bit foolish, but I’ll take any chance I can get to proselytize about the magic of Wong’s “2046,” which I conversely have no problem labeling as the Hong Kong auteur’s best film

Often lost in the shadow of its sister project, this loose sequel to “In the Mood for Love” reintroduces Tony Leung’s Chow Mo-wan reappears as a divorced, mustached, proto-Don Draper type who lives in a Hong Kong hotel and files garbage journalism whenever he isn’t busy negging on showgirls or trying to write his way out of the love story he continues to tell himself about his time with Maggie Cheung’s Su Li-zhen. That process is discursive and impressionistic, even by Wong’s usual standards; if “In the Mood for Love” flirted with symptoms of “Vertigo,” “2046” is so dizzying that it can leave you feeling a little seasick. Points of interest include a rotating cast of beautiful women (including Gong Li as Maggie Cheung’s doppelganger), a timeline that loops around on itself with little warning, and even a glimpse at an imagined future where people can take a train to 2046 in order to recapture their lost memories. No one has ever come back. Once this movie finally clicks into place for you, there’s a good chance that you won’t be coming back either.

Available to stream July 2.

Other highlights:

– “The Idiots” (7/7)
– “California Split” (7/9)
– “La Belle Noiseuse” (7/20)

The cast of Support the Girls

Photo : Magnolia Selects

“Support the Girls” (dir. Andrew Bujalski, 2018)

It might seem like “Support the Girls” is listed as the best movie added to Magnolia Selects virtually every other month (the company can really only reshuffle its library so many times), but whatever — there’s never a bad time to recommend Andrew Bujalski’s workplace comedy masterpiece, and no such thing as “too many times” to do it.

As an umpteenth reminder of its greatness, here’s what IndieWire’s Eric Kohn wrote about “Support the Girls” when we named it one of the 100 best films of the 2010s:

“Regina Hall is astonishing in Andrew Bujalski’s touching look at an earnest woman who manages a sleazy Texas ‘breastauraunt,’ where many things go wrong over the course of a single hectic day. Bujalski’s typically subdued, character-based storytelling takes on a new volume of warmth and sensitivity with this striking examination of surviving difficult times through unbridled empathy. That might sound cheesy, but Bujalski’s such a wizard when it comes to scripting authentic dialogue that ‘Support the Girls’ may as well be a documentary. Hall’s manager juggles each new challenge with a steely resolve that makes her one of Bujalski’s greatest characters, the indefatigable creation of a filmmaker who excels at exploring the nuances of human behavior.

Available to stream July 4.

Other highlights:

– “Broken English” (7/11)
– “Ukraine Is not a Brothel” (7/18)
– “Survival of the Dead” (7/25)

Titanic on Netflix

Photo : Netflix

“Titanic” (dir. James Cameron, 1997)

Finally, you can watch one of the greatest blockbusters ever made the way that James Cameron intended for it to be seen: Streaming on Netflix in the immediate aftermath of a tragic accident that somehow makes watching a 26-year-old movie about the sinking of the Titanic feel like it’s weirdly “too soon.” This is just the latest and most unfortunate wrinkle in a Hollywood legend that had already taken on a life of its own by the time the movie itself even came out, but what makes Cameron’s epic so unbeatable is how all of the noise surrounding “Titanic” fades away the minute you start watching it. 

Available to stream July 1.

Other highlights

– “The Squid and the Whale” (7/1)
– “Wham!” (7/5)
– “The Deepest Breath” (7/1)

Bae Doo-na in Air Doll

Photo : OVID

“Air Doll” (dir. Hirokazu Kore-eda, 2009)

OVID might be known for showcasing well-curated obscurities and digging up diamonds in the rough, but this excellent little service (itself a diamond in the rough) is making a play for a slightly wider audience with its jam-packed July slate, which features some of the highest-profile movies the platform has ever hosted. Of course, everything is relative: There are few other contexts where early films by Alice Rohrwacher (“The Wonders”) or Kelly Reichardt (“River of Grass”) would feel like 800-pound gorillas, but such vaunted modern classics — alongside the likes of Hirokazu Kore-eda’s heartbreaking and heartbreakingly hard-to-find “Air Doll,” a modern fairytale starring Bae Doo-na as an inflatable sex doll who comes to life — fit beautifully alongside the more esoteric titles in OVID’s library, and might be enough to lure a new audience towards movies they may never have discovered otherwise. 

Available to stream July 7.

Other highlights:

– “We Are Little Zombies” (7/7)
– “River of Grass” (7/7)
– “The Wonders” (7/13)

Frankie Corio and Paul Mescal in Aftersun

Photo : Paramount Plus

“Aftersun” (dir. Charlotte Wells, 2022)

I’m honestly still trying to figure out what Paramount Plus really is beyond the subject of a very strange commercial in which a sentient mountain shaped like Sylvester Stallone sneezes onto some other celebrities, but July sees the new-ish platform adopting a more compelling new identity: For now, at least, Paramount Plus is the place where you can stream the single best movie of 2022, Charlotte Wells’ “Aftersun.” That alone would make it one of the better services out there. Throw in a few more recent gems like the Emily Brontë biopic “Emily” and Luca Guadagnino’s characteristically under-appreciated “Bones and All” and it seems like Paramount Plus might be on its way to becoming something more than “that thing I only re-subscribe to when there are new episodes of ‘Evil.’” 

Available July 1.

Other highlights:

– “Emily” (7/10)
– “It Follows” (7/12)
– “Bones and All” (7/31)

Noomi Rapace in You Won't Be Alone

Photo : Peacock

“You Won’t Be Alone” (dir. Goran Stolevski, 2022)

Here’s what IndieWire’s Alison Foreman had to say about “You Won’t Be Alone” when she named it the second-best horror movie of 2022, after “Barbarian”:

You won’t be alone. It’s a hell of a sentence — and an even better title — entirely dependent on the type of the isolation proposed. Said of a dark basement à la “Barbarian,” it’s a terrifying thing to hear. Said of your dying day, it might seem important, even spiritually essential.

Writer/director Goran Stolevski spins that intriguing duality into a stunning supernatural vision for his directorial debut, following a young witch named Navena on a sensual and sorrowful odyssey through 19th-century Macedonia. When “Wolf-Eateress” Maria (a slick but still crushing Anamaria Marinca) comes to collect on an old curse, she turns the 16-year-old Navena into a witch, intending to keep her as a companion. Enthralled by the beauty of life, however, the hyper-sheltered Navena (played in order by Leontina Bainović, Noomi Rapace, Carloto Cotta, and Alice Englert) soon sets out on her own, basking and wilting under the bright light of humanity’s warmth. As Nevena pursues acceptance and Maria pursues Nevena, the film whispers with menace and mercy, “You won’t be alone.”

Available to stream July 16.

Other highlights:

– “Jaws” (7/1)
– “Role Models” (7/1)
– “Ambulance” (7/23)

Till

Photo : Prime

“Till” (dir. Chinonye Chukwu, 2022)

Chinonye Chukwu’s anguished drama about the lynching of Emmett Till may not have received the attention it deserved last awards season, but this lucid retelling of an American tragedy seems certain to become one of modern Hollywood’s most essential biopics now that it’s available to stream. Anchored by Danielle Deadwyler’s poised yet deeply piercing turn as Emmett’s indomitable mother, Mamie — a singular performance that only seems more powerful in the context of the film’s more conventional choices — “Till” may cover more ground than it can handle, but, as IndieWire’s Kate Erbland wrote in her review, the movie “comes to life when daring to be as fierce, as confrontational, and as passionate as the real Mamie.”

Available to stream July 18.

Other highlights:

– “Birdman of Alcatraz” (7/1)
– “Knock at the Cabin” (7/25)
– “Heaven Can Wait” (7/29)

In Tarantino-Inspired ‘Agent Elvis,’ the King Battles the Manson Family, Drug Dealers — and Robert Goulet

Voiced by Matthew McConaughey, Elvis goes undercover in this animated Netflix series that’s so meta that Baz Luhrmann plays the director of Presley’s final movie.


Bill Desowitz  @BillDesowitz

“Agent Elvis,” the hand-drawn adult animated Netflix series from Sony Pictures Animation and directed by Fletcher Moules (“Entergalactic”), re-imagines Elvis Presley as a super cool spy in a wild, gory, drugged-out alternate reality. It crosses “Archer” with “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” putting the King square in the crosshairs of everyone from the Manson Family and Howard Hughes to Richard Nixon and Timothy Leary — all while retaining recognizable signposts from Presley’s life, from concert specials to his hatred of Robert Goulet.

There’s also an array of hilarious cameos, including Stanley Kubrick shooting a staged moon landing — guess who ends up in the space suit? — and a young George Lucas getting inspiration for the lightsaber from Hughes’ radioactive urine stream weapon. “Agent Elvis” is so meta that Baz Luhrmann even voices the director of Presley’s final film “Change of Habit.”

RELATED

In fact, the Quentin Tarantino-like vibe was a key part of the pitch when creators Priscilla Presley (Elvis’ ex-wife) and rock singer John Eddie first approached Sony in 2014. Little did they know that the director was simultaneously embarking on his “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” revenge fantasy to slaughter the Manson Family. As it turned out, Manson and his cult are the centerpiece of the premiere episode (“Full Tilt”), in which they target Elvis as he prepares for his ’68 “Comeback Special.” Eddie, who served as showrunner with Mike Arnold (“Archer”) specifically chose that pivotal moment as the launching pad for the series because that’s when they thought Elvis was at his coolest.

“So we were kind of like neck and neck [with Tarantino],” Eddie told IndieWire. “Who would come out first in that Charlie Manson of it all? You know, Elvis really was on Manson’s kill list, and so it felt like a natural jumping-off point.” The catalyst for the series, though, was the bizarre meeting between Elvis and President Nixon in 1970, where the rock star offered his services as a Federal Agent to combat illegal drug culture. That encounter found its way into Episode 5 (“Maximum Density”), where Elvis tries to intercept a secret file from the White House. Naturally, this Elvis regrets meeting Nixon after witnessing his nasty racism.

Agent Elvis. Fred Armisen as Charles Manson in Agent Elvis. Cr. COURTESY OF NETFLIX © 2023

The Manson Family on “Agent Elvis”

COURTESY OF NETFLIX

They were able to tap into other bizarre aspects of Elvis’ life, too, such as his obsession with martial arts and his pet chimpanzee, Scatter, here portrayed as a coked-up, Hunter S. Thompson-like sidekick (voiced by Tom Kenny). But the writers were careful about their use of historical revisionism. “At one point we were debating whether or not Manson should die,” said Eddie. “And we were like, no, because he has to stay alive to become the counterculture demon. So our history tries to stay true to real history, with our crazy alternate history working behind the scenes.”

Although Elvis initially resists being recruited into the covert spy organization TCB by snarky agent CeCe Ryder (Kaitlin Olson), he relents when offered a jet pack by the Nick Fury-like Commander (Don Cheadle). Also joining Elvis in his crime-fighting antics is good ol’ boy sidekick Bobby Ray (Johnny Knoxville), who’s handy with cars and planes. “The story had to focus on how it was all gonna play out as Elvis is slowly learning [how to be a spy],” Arnold said. “What happened to him, without him remembering, dates back to when he was in the military. At the same time, growing the mystery of [the big threat] and who’s behind it.”

Priscilla, who voices herself, was on board from the outset with the absurd comedy, having appeared in “The Naked Gun,” and sharing that Elvis was a fan of Monty Python and Mel Brooks movies. “The writers really pushed things to the edge, and I think it was really brave for her to let them maybe go farther than she particularly would’ve wanted to herself,” added Eddie.

Agent Elvis (L to R) Jason Mantzoukas as Howard Hughes, Matthew McConaughey as Elvis and Kaitlin Olson as Cece in Agent Elvis. Cr. COURTESY OF NETFLIX © 2023

Howard Hughes on “Agent Elvis”

COURTESY OF NETFLIX

Fortunately, Matthew McConaughey, who was always their first choice to voice Elvis, was not a hard get. “How do we make this cool?” Eddie said. “We wanted the look of the show to be cool, and we wanted all the energy to feel cool with that singular character. And Matthew was such a wonderful fit. We were so fortunate to have him because he has this effortless swagger. And he found the music in Elvis’ voice that he brought to every line. He worked very hard at that and really nailed it.”

The initial character designs were handled by famed graphic artist/animator Robert Valley (the “Pear Cider and Cigarettes” short), and the animation was done by acclaimed 2D studio Titmouse (“Big Mouth”). The show pops with saturated colors and the graphic, noir-like language of the period (’68-’73), and Valley’s signature geometric style was the driving force. “He even said that Elvis was the hardest character he’s ever designed,” Arnold said. “Because if you turn one angle or you get one thing a little bit off, it throws everything off. Elvis was such a beautiful man and was so hard to capture. We actually ended up having to do a 3D model of Robert’s designs to really get the Elvis character.”

Priscilla Presley plays Priscilla Presley on “Agent Elvis”
COURTESY OF NETFLIX

Titmouse not only provided a comic book-influenced cool factor with the martial arts fight sequences (studying Elvis’ dance movies from his concerts) but also honed in on every environment and background prop. “Certainly the season finale was the hardest because we’re going to so many places,” Eddie said. “We’re in outer space, we’re in a volcano [with Elvis fighting Robert Goulet], and all around Hawaii, and flying around on jet packs. And when you’re animating an episode like that, you have to bring a lot of different things.”

As far as a potential Season 2, the showrunners are excited about the possibility of turning Elvis loose in the ’80s: “We’ve already started out mapping Season 2 and we want to see it go where people haven’t seen Elvis before, where he’s gotta figure out how to stay in the shadows and try to keep the reality of it there.”

“… A 7mm Difference Between Lenses is Actually Quite a Huge Amount…”: DP James Friend on All Quiet on the Western Front

by Matt Mulcahey
in CinematographersColumnsInterviews
on Mar 4, 2023

All Quiet on the Western FrontJames FriendNetflix

War is young men dying and old men talking.

The former lies at the heart of Erich Maria Remarque’s 1928 novel All Quiet on the Western Front, based on the German writer’s experiences in the trenches of World War I. In Netflix’s new adaptation, the l atter half of that axiom is also represented with the addition of a subplot centered on the armistice negotiations that ultimately ended fighting on the Western Front.

As in Remarque’s novel, the story is principally told through the eyes of Paul Bäumer, a teenager who—propelled by patriotic fervor—enlists alongside his schoolmates only to be disillusioned by the brutality and inhumanity of the conflict.

The film recently earned nine Oscar nominations, including a nod for cinematographer James Friend. The British DP employed an assortment of cameras (Arri Alexa 65, Alexa Mini LF, Sony Venice and Red Weapon) and lenses (Arri Prime DNA, Prime 65 S, Tribe7 Blackwing7, a detuned 21mm Zeiss CP.3 and a custom-built 18.5mm) over the 53-day shoot in the Czech Republic. Locations included a recreation of the French and German trenches and the No Man’s Land in between, brought to life at a Soviet-era airfield.

With the movie currently streaming on Netflix, Friend spoke to Filmmaker about his compulsion for symmetrical composition, devoting 10 weeks to a few fleeting but crucial frames of fox cubs, and collaborating to create “the most cinematic latrine ever.”

Filmmaker: Let’s start at the very beginning. The first images in All Quiet on the Western Front are a sunrise over the mountains, a forest at dawn and a fox and her cubs in their den. These interstitial glimpses of nature recur throughout the film. What is the function of those shots?

Friend: The film—and the novel—are predominantly anti-war stories and I think, in order to appreciate that, you need to appreciate what war takes away. So, when [director] Edward Berger and I were discussing what could contrast the horror of the film, we wanted to find imagery that represented the opposing side, I suppose, and nature is one of the most beautiful things you can destroy. We went on these tech scouts and found these lovely locations. The first shot in the film is actually the first frame we ever shot [on the project]. It was up in the mountains somewhere in the Czech Republic. We left our hotel room at midnight, and we traveled for about two hours to the location and then we had to, basically like a documentary team, walk the tripod and a 65mm camera up the mountain and sit there and wait for the sun to rise. We got this very lovely sunrise, and it got even more dramatic [as the sun came up further], but we actually thought that part was too indulgent for the movie. Then on the way back I spotted these woods as we were sort of half asleep and I said, “They’ve got lovely pine trees!” So, we pulled over and shot that too.

Filmmaker: There’s a Wildlife Unit listed in the credits. Did they handle some of those nature shots?

Friend: There’s this great wildlife cameraman called Rob Hollingworth, who specializes in shooting animals and wildlife. We worked very closely together to shoot the fox sequence, which was originally supposed to be a little bit bigger. The reason it needed its own camera person is because we had to essentially put a pregnant fox in a purpose-built den that was designed for shooting with camera traps. The fox then gave birth to the cubs in this den and that turned into what you saw on camera. 

Filmmaker: Wait, those are real foxes and that’s a set?

Friend: They’re totally real foxes. One hundred percent. They were born in that den. The only way to get those shots is basically to raise the cubs in the environment in which you’re filming them, so the mother and the cubs feel completely at home. Then, if a probe lens comes in to get a closeup of a cub or the mom, they’re already used to it by that stage. Essentially, we wanted it to look like a David Attenborough piece and not like a movie. We wanted that to feel very documentary. A lot of care went into it. That was about a 10-week exercise to build it and then get the mum in there and for her to give birth. We were getting constant updates. We had to prelight it beforehand because it’s not like you can just turn the lights on and go “action.” The lights already had to be burning and constantly in place. 

Filmmaker: That’s an insane amount of work for what ends up being three or four shots in the movie.

Friend: It was originally supposed to be a little bit more, but not a lot more. But everyone was very aware that it was going to be the opening of the film.

Filmmaker: The first image of the battlefield is a bird’s eye view that booms down and then pushes in across a wasteland strewn with bodies. You used your 18.5mm lens for that?

Friend: Yes, an 18.5mm custom lens from Arri on the Alexa 65. The only reason we landed on that lens for that shot was because we couldn’t get the 75-foot Technocrane in there because we didn’t have 4×4 bases for it. I actually didn’t want to be on such a bendy lens for that. I wanted to be on a longer lens and higher up, but logistics and budget and everything else made us go another way. You don’t notice it when [the camera is looking straight down] but when [it starts to push in] you can see the foreground bending a little bit and that’s just the nature of that wide lens. Some people have said they really love the way it looks, but I would’ve liked to have been just one [more focal length] up just to even up those edges a little bit and make [the audience] a little less conscious of the camera. 

Filmmaker: You follow that crane move with an impressive tracking shot that starts down in the trenches, elevates as a solider climbs out and then sprints after that solider as he charges across No Man’s Land. You used the Stabileye for that shot and in the pictures I’ve seen of your set-up the rig is basically suspended from a crossbar with handles on each end. Was that bar custom-made?

Friend: We had trenches to run down so we needed to tailor the rig to be the right size and our grips built that [crossbar] for it. I think it’s just a bit of tubing that we had engineered and then we put some sort of bike grips on the end of it.

Filmmaker: To get the camera out of the trench for that shot, you attached it to another bespoke piece of rigging—basically some speed rail and clamps at the end of a Technocrane.

Friend: Yeah, exactly. It just boomed down into the trench, and we docked the Stabileye’s handlebars onto it and lifted it up. It was insane because it only had to raise up 11 feet or something like that, but we had to use a 50-foot Technocrane for it just because we needed a 4×4 base and I think the minimum they can go on is 50-foot. It was this enormous bit of kit for quite an elegant move.

Filmmaker: What’s the advantage of the Stabileye compared to something like a MōVI?

Friend: I’ve used a few different [types of gimbals and stabilizers]. I don’t think I’ve used a MōVI, but I’ve used a Ronin and the engineering and operation of the Stabileye, at least for my taste, is much more refined. Also, the footprint is much smaller. When you’re dealing with getting the camera past actors in very close quarters like a trench, that makes all the difference.

Filmmaker: And then once you’re out of the trench for that shot, two grips remove the handlebars from the Technocrane and start sprinting behind the actor with the Stabileye while your camera operator Danny Bishop controls the pan and tilt remotely.

Friend: Yeah. That was the other thing—the range [for wireless signal] of the Stabileye was significantly better than other parties.

Filmmaker: Did you have to rack exposure as you came out of the trench and went out into the sunlight? 

Friend: Oh yeah, there were all sorts of adjustments happening, including massive iris pulls. 

Filmmaker: How long was the reset for that shot? Because you’ve got pyro and all kinds of background craziness going on.

Friend: We were actually quite lean. Every air cannon that we built with an explosion had another one next to it that was pre-loaded, so we could have a pretty quick turnaround. Even so, it was 30 to 40 minutes, and we were tracking things with the sun so we couldn’t afford any wasted time.

Filmmaker: When you are doing those long tracking shots in an open battlefield across hundreds of feet, is there much you can do to light? 

Friend: You’re at the [mercy of] the grace of God. The two biggest tools in the arsenal are your pan glass and good scheduling. We spent a lot of time staring at the clouds [through the pan glass] and waiting for a bit of soft light and a bit of consistency. My gaffer would shout at me, “I’m a gaffer. I’m not Gandalf.” I kept asking him, “How long? How long? How long” We would both sit there burning our retinas out staring at the sun. We really had production on our side, though. I said I wanted to shoot in overcast skies, and I had a sympathetic director. So, a lot of it was just patience even though we were on a really tight schedule. Sometimes we’d have to wait and wait because we’d have a clear blue sky [and we wanted cloud cover] and there would be a lot of nervous people on set getting itchier and itchier, none more so than me. You can obviously control the closeups more, but when you’re shooting on large format, the field of view is so large that even closeups are hard to navigate. You really just have to wait for the right sunlight and have a production willing to support you. Oh, and a good 1st AD. Benedict Hoermann was an absolute ninja.

Filmmaker: The solider featured in that opening series of shots doesn’t make it out of that battle alive. The next sequence in the film, an addition to Remarque’s book, follows the journey of his uniform as it’s recycled and eventually ends up in the hands of Paul Bäumer.

Friend: That scene expresses the idea that all of these soldiers are dispensable, and you don’t really have an identity. At best, you have a number. That’s absolutely one of my favorite sequences of the film.

Filmmaker: The visual grammar changes in that sequence. The opening in the battlefield is all chaotic tracking shots. Here, the shots are more static and carefully composed. And as the uniform makes its way to its new owner—from the battlefield, through the laundry, and eventually to a supply truck that brings it to Paul—the palette changes from cool to neutral to warm. 

Friend: It’s supposed to be this journey from death and then getting closer and closer to life and innocence. We go from the front line in France to back home in Germany and everything becomes a bit more beautified and a bit more symmetrical.

Filmmaker: Is everything in that sequence shot with the Alexa 65?

Friend: Everything except the first shot in the sequence. 

Filmmaker: All on Arri DNAs or did you use any Blackwings?

Friend: It was a huge mixture. The shot of all the coffins was a detuned CP.3. The rest was a mixture of the Blackwings and the DNAs.

Filmmaker: What dictated the lens choice? If you had a 57mm Blackwing and a 50mm DNA, how did you determine which to use?

Friend: You kind of rely on instinct. And, believe it or not, a 7mm difference between lenses is actually quite a huge amount when you’re really refining and deciding a shot. Originally, I had the Blackwings because they’re a stop faster than the DNAs and I wanted them for the night exteriors [to pair with the Sony Venice]. But they also flare very differently than the DNAs so I ended up using them throughout the film. I’m a DP that is kind of obsessed, as we all are, with highlights and with contrast within a frame. I like to have a very bright point in the frame and a very dark point within the same frame and when you are dealing with lenses that flare in such specific ways, that can be the difference between a really destructive image and a beautiful image. So, it was all about what reacted in each environment. If you’ve got a really bright window or a really bright sky, sometimes the DNAs were perfect and sometimes the Blackwings were spot on. I got used to both lenses so much that I would just call it on the day. It’s a real sort of horses for courses. I was also influenced by Lawrence Sher. He showed me his lens list for Joker, and he had this sort of Frankenstein’s monster selection of lenses. I had always been very precious beforehand about glass but talking [to Lawrence] gave me this release of anxiety and allowed me to embrace [using an assortment of different glass].

Filmmaker: I’ve heard you talk frequently in other interviews about how you wanted the trenches and the battlefield to be an immersive experience that put you into that environment through Paul’s point of view. However, when you’re not on the battlefield, the compositions are extremely formal and symmetrical.

Friend: I don’t know any other way to compose because I think composition should be formal. It’s just the way my brain works. When something’s off in the frame, it really throws me.

Filmmaker: I’m the exact same way. If one soldier was out of place in one those wides where everyone is lined up perfectly, it would really get under my skin.

Yeah. Yeah. It freaks me out, to the point where I have to tweak it and no one else even sees it apart from you. For example, in the wide shot where all the soldiers are lined up to get their uniforms, I remember literally being on a megaphone like, “Everyone in the third row from the left, take a mini step to your right.” Composition is everything. It really is.

Filmmaker: That scene where Paul and the other new recruits are issued their uniforms is one of my favorites, photographically. Where was that shot and how did you light that space through the large glass ceiling overhead?

Friend: It’s a location in Prague. I’m not sure what the building was used for. There’s about 24 inches between that glass and another ceiling above. What we actually did was put two custom made balloons in there that were very shallow. We forced them in there when they were deflated and then we inflated them when they were in the space. It gave us just the right amount of exposure. The whole thing was lit by those balloons, apart from the outside windows, where we had some little bounces just for a bit of separation in the backgrounds.

Filmmaker: Like the journey of the uniform sequence, another addition to the original novel is a side story about the armistice negotiations, which takes place mostly on a stationary train. You shot that on stage with LED screens outside the windows.

Friend: The train was a challenging sequence. There was discussion about taking a period train and actually shooting it in the forest at night and I was so dead against it. We ended up building that set at Barrandov Studios in Prague with two very simple LED walls. I think it worked a treat, really. I wouldn’t have done it any differently. I didn’t want it to feel like a studio and I also wanted to be able to go between day and night. So, we shot these array plates with French soldiers walking around in the background just to give it a bit of reality.

Filmmaker: Often with virtual production, the LED walls themselves provide a good deal of the lighting. The behind-the-scenes shots of your train set-up that I’ve seen make it look like you used quite a bit of movie lights as well.

Friend: Using the plates [as our primary illumination] didn’t really work for us because you would’ve had to increase the luminance so much [to push the light through the train windows] that the screens would’ve been overexposed on camera. So I needed to separate the exposure between the inside of the train and the outside of the train, hence why we had all the Arri SkyPanel 360s with chimeras above the train and going through the windows. Then we could independently control the luminance of the screen and the color of the screen as well.

Filmmaker: One of my favorite things about the film is the environmental details. For example, there’s a scene where Paul and an older solider named Kat steal a goose from a nearby farm. The scene begins with a close-up of bullets rattling around in the back of the truck they’re riding in and then a shot of Paul’s boots swaying over the tailgate. The movie is full of those types of details. You spent more than two months storyboarding and shotlisting the entire moving with the director before you started shooting. Were those details preplanned or things you found on set?

Friend: The shot of the bullet shells was one that I actually found on the day. I pitched it to Ed, and he said, “Yeah, that sounds great.” Weirdly, it’s one of my favorite shots of the film. And I love the shot of the dog tags [being sorted through]. We knew we wanted those details, but we didn’t exactly know what they were going to be until we got in the environments. A lot can be said for putting a big, wide lens on the camera and getting in close to something, so you see the environment while also seeing detail in the foreground, which I think is one of our signatures in this film.

Filmmaker: As we talked about earlier, there are some quite impressive camera moves in the battle scenes. However, one of my favorite moments is a quiet scene largely played out in a static two shot where Paul reads a letter to Kat from his wife while they’re on the latrine. 

Friend: I love static frames more than I love movement to be perfectly honest. My natural instinct is to just move the camera when actors move. A lot of time and care went into that scene, from the costume and makeup teams to the entire art department to our wonderful production designer Christian Goldbeck, who created the most cinematic latrine ever. The level of detail even went down to finding the right angle for the latrine so it would have this lovely line of trees behind it. We didn’t just put the toilet scene in some rubbish woods somewhere. We wanted the trees in the background to be linear and straight. It’s all very considered. I think that’s what I’m the proudest of, actually, because we considered every single frame, and you don’t get that luxury on every job. After having that on this movie, I kind of don’t really want to do jobs where we can’t be that considered anymore. Thankfully Netflix, the director, the producers and everyone involved in the film were very collaborative and that enabled us to create these [images] exactly the way we wanted to create them.

‘JACK RYAN’ TEMPORADA 3 BATE EL RÉCORD DE AUDIENCIA DE ‘MIÉRCOLES’

La serie del mundo de Tom Clancy ha vuelto con mucha fuerza y, aunque sin baile viral, le ha robado el trono a Jenna Ortega y los Addams.

POR RAFAEL SÁNCHEZ CASADEMONT

John Krasinski ha dejado por el momento su alabada labor como director de terror de ‘Un lugar tranquilo’ para volver a encarnar al héroe de acción de Tom Clancy que da nombre a una de las series más emblemáticas de Amazon Prime desde su lanzamiento. ‘Jack Ryan’ ha regresado muy fuerte con su temporada 3 y lo cierto es que lo ha hecho batiendo un récord de audiencia en streaming que tenía la exitosa ‘Miércoles’ de Netflix.

En la última clasificación de Nielsen sobre la audiencia de las producciones originales del streaming en Estados Unidos (en datos recogidos por TVLine), la temporada 3 de ‘Jack Ryan’ acumuló 1.834 mil millones de minutos en sus 24 capítulos mientras que ‘Miércoles’ sumó 1.8 mil millones. Eso sí, la serie de Netflix lo logró con solo 8 episodios.

Amazon Studios

Eso sí, ‘Jack Ryan’ sigue contando con una audiencia muy diferente a la de ‘Miércoles’ u otros éxitos juveniles de Netflix. Según el mismo medio, y siempre hablando de Estados Unidos, la masiva audiencia de ‘Jack Ryan’ tenía más de 50 % en el 66% de los cosas y el 56% de la audiencia eran hombres. Este último dato sorprende, en realidad, por su mesura, ya que desmiente algo el tópico de que las series de acción solo funcionan en el público masculino.

Se ha confirmado que habrá temporada 3, pero también que será la última. No solo eso, si no que ya se ha filmado. Por eso, es de esperar que llegue este mismo año 2023. Eso sí, el mundo de Tom Clancy tiene todavía mucho más contenido por el que tirar. Si bien Jack Ryan llegará a su fin junto con el contrato de John Krasinski, Amazon ya tiene planeado varios spin-off, incluido uno que protagonizará Michael Peña.

michael pena

Jason LaVerisGetty Images

‘Miércoles’, que pierde en la clasificación única y exclusivamente por su escaso número de episodios, ha sido una de las únicas grandes alegrías de Netflix en los últimos tiempos. Por tanto, no es de extrañar que ya haya confirmada una temporada 2 de ‘Miércoles’. Sin embargo, todavía no se conoce la fecha de estreno, ni tampoco la de producción y rodaje. Hablamos de una serie que rompió casi todos los récords de audiencia de Netflix, y a la que solo se le resistió el fenómeno de Corea del Sur ‘El juego del calamar’. Título que, cómo no, también tendrá temporada 2 pese a haberse planteado como una serie autoconclusiva.

La primera temporada de ‘Miércoles’ se encuentra disponible en Netflix España. Las tres primeras temporadas de ‘Jack Ryan’, de Tom Clancy, están en Amazon Prime Video España.

‘MIÉRCOLES’: ¿HABRÁ TEMPORADA 2 DE LA SERIE DE TIM BURTON EN NETFLIX?

Las aventuras de Miércoles Addams en la Academia Nunca Más solo acaban de comenzar… esperamos.

POR FRAN CHICO

Ya contamos los segundos para recibir la noticia de que ‘Miércoles’ tendrá una temporada 2 entre las series de Netflix. Tenemos razones y argumentos: además de una de las mejores series de Netflix en 2022 (y una de las mejores series de 2022 en general), el estreno de ‘Miércoles’ ha sido un sonoro exitazo en la plataforma, rompiendo récords y colándose entre las más vistas de su historia. Entonces, ¿a qué espera Netflix para renovar la serie? De momento, recopilamos aquí todo lo que sabemos sobre la continuación.

La serie dirigida por Tim Burton nos ha adentrado en las aulas de ‘Nunca más’, la escuela para inadaptados sociales en la que Jenna Ortega se mete en la pálida piel de Miércoles Addams. La primera temporada de ‘Miércoles’ ha estado marcada por los misterios y, aunque las habilidades psíquicas y detectivescas de la pequeña de los Addams ha revelado casi todos ellos, al finalizar el octavo y último episodio la puerta parece abierta para continuar con su historia. Como apuntábamos, los números la acompañan: ‘Miércoles’ ha roto todos los récords de visionados en Netflix, superando incluso a ‘Stranger Things’. Según sus datos, la serie acumuló 341,2 millones de horas de visionado en todo el mundo, dejando atrás los 335 millones de horas de la temporada 4 de ‘Stranger Things’ en la semana del 30 de mayo al 5 de junio.

wednesday jenna ortega as wednesday addams in episode 105 of wednesday cr vlad ciopleanetflix © 2022

Netflix

En una entrevista con Empire, los co-creadores Alfred Gough y Miles Miller han revelado que son optimistas sobre el futuro potencial de ‘Miércoles’, refiriéndose a episodios estrenados como una «primera» temporada de la serie. Dejando caer que él y Millar han discutido entre ellos lo que podría venir a continuación, Gough afirma que están ansiosos por explorar el resto del universo de ‘La Familia Addams‘. «Miles y yo estamos hablando entre nosotros al respecto. Definitivamente hay mucho más por explorar en el mundo de los Addams.«

En una entrevista con Empire, los co-creadores Alfred Gough y Miles Miller han revelado que son optimistas sobre el futuro potencial de ‘Miércoles’, refiriéndose a episodios estrenados como una «primera» temporada de la serie. Dejando caer que él y Millar han discutido entre ellos lo que podría venir a continuación, Gough afirma que están ansiosos por explorar el resto del universo de ‘La Familia Addams‘. «Miles y yo estamos hablando entre nosotros al respecto. Definitivamente hay mucho más por explorar en el mundo de los Addams.«

‘Miércoles’, temporada 2: fecha de estreno

Por el momento Netflix no ha renovado la serie y por tanto no hay fecha de estreno disponible, pero ya hemos visto que no será por falta de ideas (y de ganas) de los creadores. Tampoco está claro si Tim Burton regresaría como director, ya que en la primera temporada solo ha dirigido la mitad de los episodios y sus compañeros cineastas Gandja Monteiro y James Marshall podrían tomar el relevo (o nombres nuevos).

wednesday thing in episode 108 of wednesday cr courtesy of netflix © 2022

Netflix

‘Miércoles’, temporada 2: Sinopsis

Las posibilidades son infinitas. Lo lógico sería situar la trama en un nuevo curso escolar en ‘Nunca más’, siguiendo la misma estructura que las películas de ‘Harry Potter‘ (con la que la serie de Netflix comparte bastantes paralelismos). Pero sería espectacular trasladar la acción a la mansión de los Addams y recuperar varios de sus personajes míticos de manera regular: el tío Fétido, el primo Eso, la abuela…

En una entrevista con TVLine, el creador habló sobre la posible historia de la temporada 2 y cómo la protagonista tendrá que aprender a lidiar con sus amistades (y sus emociones):

«La serie es realmente sobre una chica que ve el mundo en blanco y negro, y tiene que aprender que también hay tonos grises. Creo que, como cualquier relación o amistad, puede complicarse por otros factores. Nunca va a ser fácil. Y es realmente su aprendizaje para navegar por los altibajos de la amistad»

wednesday l to r catherine zeta jones as morticia adams, luis guzmán as gomez addams in episode 101 of wednesday cr courtesy of netflix © 2022

Netflix

‘Miércoles’, temporada 2: Reparto

Obviamente, si se confirma una segunda temporada el regreso de Jenna Ortega es obligado como Miércoles Addams. La actriz tenía un reto gigante por delante, ya que la Miércoles de Christina Ricci es todo un icono de la cultura popular. Pero Ortega ha cumplido con creces, y es el principal acierto de este reboot de la franquicia. Cosa, la mano cercenada que la acompaña a todas partes, es la otra gran interpretación de la serie. En serio lo decimos. Tiene que volver sí o sí.

Otros miembros de la Familia como Morticia (Catherine Zeta-Jones), Gómez (Luis Guzmán), Pugsley (Isaac Ordoñez), Largo (George Burcea) y el tío Fétido (Fred Armisen) deberían regresar, así como los mejores amigos de Miércoles en la Academia ‘Nunca más’, Enid (Emma Myers), Xavier (Percy Hynes White), Bianca (Joy Sunday) y Eugene (Moosa Mostafa).

wednesday l to r jenna ortega as wednesday addams, emma myers as enid sinclair in episode 102 of wednesday cr courtesy of netflix © 2022

Netflix

Las que sí podríamos descartar, por motivos evidentes, son Christina Ricci como la profesora Thornhill, la directora Weems (Gwendoline Christie) y la doctora Kinbott (Riki Lindhome). Y ponemos en duda a Tyler Galpin (Hunter Doohan), porque nos sabemos si retomaremos su historia o quedará aparcado de la trama.

‘Miércoles’, temporada 2: Tráiler e imágenes

Estaremos atentos a cualquier novedad para actualizar con las primeras imágenes y el primer tráiler de la segunda temporada de ‘Miércoles’ en cuanto salgan a la luz.

FRAN CHICO

Además del cine, la comedia y el terror, a Fran también le apasionan el baloncesto, dormir y buscar conspiraciones locas por Internet.

EL SALARIO MILLONARIO DE LILY COLLINS POR RODAR EMILY EN PARIS

Si te preguntabas cuánto gana la actriz Lily Collins por rodar la famosa serie de Netflix ‘Emily en Paris’, aquí tienes la respuesta y, te adelantamos, vas a alucinar.

POR ELLE.ES

La ames o la odies, lo que es indiscutible es que ‘Emily en Paris‘ es una de las series más vistas y con más éxito de nuestro tiempo. ‘Sexo en Nueva York’ dejó un gran agujero en nuestros corazones cuando se terminó en 2024 y ha llovido muchísimo desde entonces.

Necesitábamos un aliciente de un tipo de serie de chicas que nos acercase mucho a la moda y a la vida de las revistas, así que Lily Collins se puso a la cabeza de este proyecto sin saber muy bien cómo iba a funcionar. Por suerte, la serie no solo ha salido adelante, sino que es una de las más vistas.

Pero, ¿cuánto cobra la actriz por capítulo y por la temporada entera? Según Celebrity News, Lily Collins cobraría alrededor de 300.000 euros por capítulo y 3 millones de euros por temporada, ya que cada una de ellas consta de 10 capítulos.

Gtres

Un sueldo millonario

Es el equivalente a lo que cobran Winona Ryder y David Harbour por ‘Stranger Things, una serie que está consagrada en parrilla virtual desde hace muchos años. Recordemos que los actores de Friends llegaron a cobrar un millón de dólares por capítulo en sus temporadas finales y prevemos algo similar para Lily Collins como la serie siga el ritmo que se espera.

Además, la actriz se ha quedado parte de los looks que ha llevado en las temporada y recordemos que las prendas son de firmas de lujo, así que este detalle también forma parte de sus ganancias.

emily in paris, lily collins

Gtres

Vía: ELLE ES

‘Glass Onion’: Todos los espectadores tienen la misma queja sobre la película de Netflix

Y tú, ¿te has dado cuenta del ‘fallo’?

POR LYDIA VENN

Nuestra crítica de ‘Puñales por la espalda: El misterio de Glass Onion’.

Final explicado de ‘Puñales por la espalda: El misterio de Glass Onion’.

Las 30 mejores películas de terror de Netflix que dan miedo.

Si te gusta el buen cine como a nosotros, habrás estado muy emocionado con el estreno de la nueva película de ‘Puñales por la espalda’, ‘El misterio de Glass Onion’, que llegó a Netflix el pasado 23 de diciembre. La secuela de la película original de 2019 cuenta con el regreso de Daniel Craig como el detective Benoit Blanc, que tiene un nuevo caso que resolver.

‘Puñales por la espalda: El misterio de Glass Onion’ nos lleva con Benoit hasta una isla griega a la que parece haber sido invitado por el multimillonario Miles Bron (Edward Norton), que está organizando su reunión anual para sus amigos. Sin embargo, no todo es lo que parece, ya que uno de los invitados aparece muerto y ahora todos son sospechosos. ¿No crees que es un gran argumento para sumergirse en esta película?

glass onion viewers have same complaint about film

NETFLIX

Web construida con WordPress.com.

Subir ↑

Diseña un sitio como este con WordPress.com
Comenzar